Significant developments are underway regarding how the American Medical Association (AMA) approaches Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The AMA is considering a policy change that would move away from recommending Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) therapy as the primary treatment for autistic people.
For a long time, the discourse around autism has been rooted in a medical model. This model focuses on “symptoms” and “cures,” which can cause anxiety for families and create a sense of shame. However, many within the autistic community and among professionals are now advocating for a different approach. They prefer language that focuses on presentations, identification, adaptation, and support rather than on diagnosis and treatment. This shift in perspective acknowledges that autism is a natural neurotype, not a condition that needs to be cured.
The Problem with 'Treatment' and the Role of Insurance
While many are embracing this shift in language, a significant challenge remains. Medical insurance companies often require the use of traditional medical terminology like “diagnosis” and “treatment” to approve funding for support and services. Without these terms, families may struggle to get the financial help they need. This highlights a crucial area for future advocacy, ensuring that financial support can be provided without forcing families to use language that perpetuates a medical model.
The Controversy Surrounding ABA Therapy
Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) is a method that has long been a source of controversy. Critics argue that it can force autistic people to mask their natural behaviours and conform to neurotypical expectations. For example, some ABA practices may prevent an autistic person from stimming or require them to sit still for long periods, which can be distressing. Many argue that these behaviours are natural forms of self-regulation and should be accommodated, not suppressed.
The potential AMA policy change is a major step in recognising these concerns. By removing specific language for ABA therapy and replacing “treatment of” with “services for” Autism Spectrum Disorder, the AMA is opening the door for a wider range of supportive and therapeutic approaches. This change is vital as it acknowledges that there are many other effective programmes and methods available that may better support the well-being and development of autistic individuals.
For more information, read the Autistic PhD digital brochure:
Here are other articles discussing this significant change:
The American Medical Association Withdraws Support For ABA And Opens The Door For More Advocacy For DIR:
Debates on the effectiveness and previous damaging controversies about ABA has meant the AMA is considering to distance itself from the therapy:
Alternatives to ABA Therapy:
11 Ethical Alternatives To ABA Therapy For Autism:
AMA House of Delegates Handbook:
